Super-speculative AvA theory

Go down

Super-speculative AvA theory

Post by Alysia Greenwood on Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:07 am

Thinking about Alliances & tiers, I wonder:

Being Tier 1, and having minimum campbuilding costs, means under 25 players in the last 3 AvA´s...

Where is the problem for a big alliance to designate a couple of members (well, under 25) to found an alliance, go through 3 successive AvA´s with 1 camp & a couple of actions to qualify, settling matters as a Tier 1 alliance. Then all members (except 1-2 keeping the original alliance alive - possibly re-incarnators who are abstain from AvA anyway) from the big one join the small one for 1 AvA, push all camps to L20 and just rock one AvA, then cool-down for the next 3? With 3 such alliances, it could be even run "round the clock".

+ could this not even be achieved through 2nd accoung of 1-2 players keeping up the Tier-1 allaince in the making, so the only obvious drawback (splitting a good team into 2 & losing) is no longer relevant?

I do not know if this works or say we should do it, just outlining a thing that came to my mind...
avatar
Alysia Greenwood

Posts : 33
Join date : 2014-09-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Super-speculative AvA theory

Post by Xrshad Shail on Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:02 pm

I was thinking on same line but drawback is we have 30 active members who play this game daily. What about asking General to form new Alliance and shifting all players to new Alliance. We lose only ranking and challenges. Drastic but possible.
avatar
Xrshad Shail

Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-09-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Super-speculative AvA theory

Post by Jay-D Dragonsbreath on Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:34 pm

This really is quite drastic. But yes, possible too. I have two things to add here:

1) Taking such a step makes little sense unless we're aiming for the top.
2) But, it's a good idea as far as saving silver (and resources to a lesser extent) is concerned.

So I say, let's see how things go in this AvA, and if the camp-building burden is too much, we'll expand on this idea.
How about it?

_________________
Jay-D Dragonsbreath
General, "We ALWAYS pay our Debts"
avatar
Jay-D Dragonsbreath
Admin

Posts : 37
Join date : 2014-09-26
Age : 24
Location : Mumbai, India

View user profile http://wepaydebts.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Super-speculative AvA theory

Post by WulfBrigg on Sun Oct 19, 2014 11:27 pm

I don't know how much we care about rankings as a whole (personally I don't pay them any mind), but the resource savings alone are really tempting. While camp growth isn't going too badly in some areas, it's a real strain in others.
avatar
WulfBrigg

Posts : 30
Join date : 2014-10-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Super-speculative AvA theory

Post by Alysia Greenwood on Mon Oct 20, 2014 3:44 am

Actually, I did not mean to prompt us to do any such thing quickly, just wanted to check if you have any info if this concept works & what you generally think about it.

We still have enough to learn & test in AvA before any such effort would be justified IMO.
avatar
Alysia Greenwood

Posts : 33
Join date : 2014-09-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Super-speculative AvA theory

Post by WulfBrigg on Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:36 pm

With the publishing of the tier numbers on the alliance page I think this idea might be worth looking into again. We currently have 232 members, 65 active this AoA. This can be reduced to a couple of light-moving alliances easily, should we desire, with coordination on this page.
avatar
WulfBrigg

Posts : 30
Join date : 2014-10-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Super-speculative AvA theory

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum